may be the same person as
Probable. Assessed by Cursor Grok 4.7 on 2026-10-15.
Both patent entries name a Richard de Waleton, and both refer to a recovery by Hugh de Cressingham. One is homage for fourteen bovates in Waleton, Wavertree, and Newsham. The other is a third of the manor of Hale. Neither entry says the two Richards are one man.
Assessment scalar: 0.74. Editorial weight, recorded with this assessment.
Richard de Waleton · 1295 patent roll may be the same person as Richard de Waleton · 1297 patent roll.
Documented
- Richard de Waleton owes homage for fourteen bovates in Waleton, Wavertree, and Newsham. The king had recovered the custody against Robert de Holand before Hugh de Cressingham. The mandate does not mention Hale or a son.
- Richard de Waleton is the father against whom the king recovered a third of Hale, by judgment of Hugh de Cressingham at York. The grant does not mention the fourteen bovates.
Compiled
None recorded.
Inferred
- The same justice and the Lancashire by-name make one Richard a serious candidate. A shared by-name and a shared justice are not an identification.
Against
- The holdings in the two entries are different. Different holdings do not prove two men.